What is a Managed Care Organization? Understanding MCOs in Healthcare

Managed care organizations (MCOs) are a cornerstone of the modern healthcare landscape, acting as integrated systems designed to manage healthcare costs while aiming to maintain or improve the quality of care delivered.[1] Since their rise to prominence in the 1970s, MCOs have significantly reshaped healthcare delivery in the United States, influencing everything from preventative care strategies to the financial aspects of medical treatment and the establishment of clinical guidelines.[2] Understanding what managed care organizations are, how they function, and their impact is crucial for both healthcare providers and patients navigating today’s complex healthcare system.

The Foundation of Managed Care Organizations

The groundwork for today’s managed care organizations was laid with the Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973. This pivotal legislation, an amendment to the Public Health Service Act of 1944, provided the framework for MCOs and their focus on comprehensive, cost-conscious healthcare delivery.[3] For healthcare providers, grasping the intricacies of MCOs is essential. MCO policies dictate numerous facets of patient care, including the formation of provider networks, the creation of medication formularies, the implementation of utilization management protocols, and the structuring of financial incentives. These elements collectively shape how and where individuals receive their medical care.[4]

Types of Managed Care Organizations: HMOs, PPOs, POSs, and EPOs

Managed care organizations manifest in various forms, each with distinct characteristics. The most prevalent types include Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs), Point of Service (POS) organizations, and Exclusive Provider Organizations (EPOs). Distinguishing between these structures can be challenging, requiring both healthcare professionals and patients to delve deeper to fully understand their nuances. Here’s a breakdown of the key features of each type:

• Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs): In an HMO, patients select a primary care physician (PCP) within the network who acts as their central point of contact and is responsible for providing referrals to specialists. Typically, HMO insurance coverage is limited to in-network providers, making it generally the most cost-effective option. The emphasis on in-network care and the PCP as a gatekeeper are hallmarks of HMOs.

• Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs): PPOs offer patients more flexibility in choosing their healthcare providers. Patients can select from a network of preferred providers for both primary and specialized care. While PPO plans allow patients to see providers outside of the network, doing so usually results in higher out-of-pocket costs. A key advantage of PPOs is that patients can typically consult in-network specialists without needing a referral from a PCP. This increased flexibility often comes with higher premiums compared to HMOs.

• Point of Service (POS) Organizations: POS plans represent a hybrid model, blending elements of both HMOs and PPOs. Like HMOs, POS plans require patients to choose a PCP. However, they offer more PPO-like flexibility by allowing patients to seek care from in-network specialists without a referral from their PCP. While out-of-network care is an option, it is more expensive. The cost of POS plans generally falls between that of HMOs and PPOs, reflecting their balance of structure and flexibility.

• Exclusive Provider Organizations (EPOs): EPOs provide patients with the freedom to choose any provider within their network without the necessity of establishing a relationship with a primary care physician or obtaining referrals for specialist visits. However, EPO plans typically offer no coverage for out-of-network care, except in emergency situations. This focus on in-network care helps manage costs, but it’s crucial for patients to ensure their preferred providers are within the EPO network.

It’s important to note that all insurance plans, including those within MCOs, generally provide coverage for emergency medical care received out-of-network. This is because in emergency situations, patients are not in a position to choose in-network providers. However, the extent of financial coverage for emergency visits that are medically necessary can depend on various factors, such as the patient’s admission status, the network status of the facility, and the specific treatments administered.

Clinical Significance and Impact on Healthcare Delivery

Managed care organizations exert a broad influence on healthcare delivery across all its facets. Notably, research indicates that MCOs have contributed to improved patient outcomes, a factor that has fueled their growth and expansion within the healthcare system.[5],[6],[7],[8] Provider networks, a key feature of MCOs, directly impact patient choice of primary care physicians and can, depending on the specific plan’s rules, limit access to specialist care. Furthermore, the regulations imposed by MCOs have a significant effect on preventative care initiatives and the selection of preferred treatment approaches, including the development and use of medication formularies. These formularies are specifically designed to reduce overall healthcare expenditures.[1],[9]

Collectively, the regulations and mechanisms employed by managed care organizations are intended to reduce healthcare costs through effective and efficient management.[10] This cost-effective management approach can be applied to individual patient care plans over the long term or implemented on a broader public health scale.[11],[12]

Provider reimbursement models also play a crucial role in shaping healthcare utilization patterns.[13] MCOs often use financial incentives to encourage providers to align with the organization’s goals and quality metrics. Moreover, cost-sharing mechanisms, such as capitation (where providers receive a fixed payment per patient), introduce a financial dimension to providers’ decisions regarding healthcare resource utilization, potentially influencing treatment strategies.

The Role of Interprofessional Teams in Managed Care

Interprofessional healthcare teams are integral to the effective functioning of managed care organizations. A comprehensive understanding of MCOs and their influence on healthcare delivery is essential for all members of these teams.[14] In the context of managed care, healthcare providers operate within a business framework, requiring them to balance the costs of care, the provision of appropriate and effective treatment, and the complexities of reimbursement to ensure the sustainable delivery of healthcare services at a reasonable cost.

Furthermore, interdisciplinary teams must be aware of how treatment plans may be affected or modified by MCO guidelines and the potential consequences of these alterations on patient outcomes.[15] By developing a thorough understanding of the operational principles and impact of managed care organizations, interprofessional teams can play a vital role in assisting providers to deliver prudent, high-quality, and cost-effective patient care within the managed care environment.

References

1. Perez V. Effect of privatized managed care on public insurance spending and generosity: Evidence from Medicaid. Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):557-575. [PubMed: 29168257]
2. Romano PM. Managed care accreditation: the process and early findings. J Healthc Qual. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):12-6; quiz 16. [PubMed: 10129527]
3. Dorsey JL. The Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-222) and prepaid group practice plans. Med Care. 1975 Jan;13(1):1-9. [PubMed: 803289]
4. Harrison DH, Kimberly JR. Private and public initiatives in health maintenance organizations. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1982 Spring;7(1):80-95. [PubMed: 7108171]
5. Iglehart JK. Future of Long-Term Care and the Expanding Role of Medicaid Managed Care. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):182-7. [PubMed: 26760091]
6. Butler SM. How an Expanded Vision of Managed Care Organizations Could Tackle Inequities. JAMA. 2019 Jun 04;321(21):2063-2064. [PubMed: 31162558]
7. Ndumele CD, Schpero WL, Trivedi AN. Medicaid Expansion and Health Plan Quality in Medicaid Managed Care. Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2821-2838. [PMC free article: PMC6056574] [PubMed: 29230801]
8. Healy-Collier K, Jones WJ, Shmerling JE, Robertson KR, Ferry RJ. Medicaid managed care reduces readmissions for youths with type 1 diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2016 Apr;22(4):250-6. [PubMed: 27143290]
9. Kelleher KJ, Cooper J, Deans K, Carr P, Brilli RJ, Allen S, Gardner W. Cost saving and quality of care in a pediatric accountable care organization. Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135(3):e582-9. [PubMed: 25667248]
10. Komives E. Is the Move to Value-Based Care More Than Managed Care Redux? N C Med J. 2016 Jul-Aug;77(4):283-5. [PubMed: 27422955]
11. Nadash P, Ahrens J. Managed care and long-term care: a potential solution? Policy Brief (Cent Home Care Policy Res). 2005 Winter;(20):1-6. [PubMed: 15795990]
12. Schauffler HH, Scutchfield FD. Managed care and public health. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Apr;14(3):240-1. [PubMed: 9569227]
13. Grammer D. How to Succeed Under Medicaid Managed Care. N C Med J. 2019 Sep-Oct;80(5):312-316. [PubMed: 31471518]
14. Dalzell MD. Truce! Like it or not, managed care is here to stay. Trust is still thin, but physicians and plans are learning to collaborate. Manag Care. 1998 Aug;7(8):17-21. [PubMed: 10182579]
15. Wallack SS. Managed care: practice, pitfalls, and potential. Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1991:27-34. [PubMed: 10117117]